Caminantes

Camino del Norte elevation profile

831.6 km and 14,663 m of ascent, between 0 m and 708 m. Measured from the route's own GPS track rather than copied from anywhere, which matters more than it should: almost every ascent figure published for these routes, including ours until August 2026, was an estimate nobody could source.

Know these words before your Camino. Spanish is preparation, the same as boots and stages. Try the free topic

02004006008000100200300400500600700800708 m

Metres up the side, kilometres along the bottom. Ticks are stage boundaries. Sampled every 100 m against SRTM 30m, smoothed over 500 m, climbs under 3 m discarded as noise.

Move across the profile to read any point, or drag to measure a stretch. With the keyboard: focus the profile, then arrow keys to move, shift for finer steps, Enter to start and end a measurement, Escape to clear. Each stage in the table below can also be measured directly.

What the profile shows

The Camino del Norte climbs 17.6 m per kilometre on average, which makes it the fourth steepest of the 10 routes measured here. A total on its own mostly measures how long a route is; per kilometre is what decides whether your days feel hilly.

The climbing is spread fairly evenly: 39%, 30% and 31% of the total ascent falls in the first, middle and final third. There is no one section that decides the route.

The longest sustained climb runs from km 553 to km 565, gaining 614 m over 12.3 km, an average grade of 5.0%. The high point, 708 m, comes at km 762, 92% of the way in.

The hardest days

Ranked by climbing rather than distance, which is a different list and the one that decides how the evening feels.

  • Day 6, Gernika-Lumo to Bilbao : 836 m over 31.9 km
  • Day 32, Vilanova to Abadín : 788 m over 25.3 km
  • Day 4, Deba to Etxebarria : 744 m over 19.1 km
  • Day 31, Ribadeo to Vilanova : 674 m over 26.7 km
  • Day 3, Zarautz to Deba : 669 m over 22 km

Every stage

Measured ascent for every stage of the Camino del Norte
DayFromTokmAscentHigh point
1IrúnDonostia / San Sebastián24.5596 m271 m
2Donostia / San SebastiánZarautz22.3471 m310 m
3ZarautzDeba22669 m285 m
4DebaEtxebarria19.1744 m495 m
5EtxebarriaGernika-Lumo29.1622 m395 m
6Gernika-LumoBilbao31.9836 m362 m
7BilbaoSestao16.6382 m179 m
8SestaoSámano30.6459 m252 m
9SámanoEl Puente20.8168 m74 m
10El PuenteSantoña20.4414 m235 m
11SantoñaAjo17.7227 m94 m
12AjoSantander25.4164 m114 m
13SantanderArce17.3146 m75 m
14ArceSantillana del Mar20262 m122 m
15Santillana del MarLa Iglesia17.7352 m138 m
16La IglesiaSan Vicente de la Barquera15.6272 m100 m
17San Vicente de la BarqueraColombres16.8340 m122 m
18ColombresLlanes24232 m139 m
19LlanesRibadesella / Ribeseya30.4299 m107 m
20Ribadesella / RibeseyaColunga20300 m90 m
21ColungaVillaviciosa17.1282 m173 m
22VillaviciosaGijón / Xixón29.9663 m434 m
23Gijón / XixónAvilés26.2264 m187 m
24AvilésL'Arena16.7334 m178 m
25L'ArenaLa Magdalena15.8341 m196 m
26La MagdalenaAucinera15.5643 m489 m
27AucineraLuarca / Ḷḷuarca24.7342 m629 m
28Luarca / ḶḷuarcaNavia19.8280 m180 m
29NaviaPorcía15.2199 m115 m
30PorcíaRibadeo16.9163 m75 m
31RibadeoVilanova26.7674 m362 m
32VilanovaAbadín25.3788 m555 m
33AbadínVilalba20.5205 m541 m
34VilalbaA Silvosa15.8166 m518 m
35A SilvosaA Bouzaboa15.4165 m488 m
36A BouzaboaSobrado27.8429 m708 m
37SobradoArzúa21.7208 m556 m
38ArzúaO Pedrouzo19.5277 m415 m
39O PedrouzoSantiago de Compostela19.1270 m390 m

Stages are a suggested split, not a rule. Most people walk their own.

Where the numbers come from

The GPS track carries position but no height, so the altitude was measured rather than read off: 8,316 points along the route, one every 100 m, each looked up against the SRTM 30 m elevation dataset.

One check worth stating, because it is the difference between plausible and correct. Total ascent minus total descent comes to +275 m. The profile's own start and finish differ by +245 m, so the two agree to within 30 m over 831.6 km.

They do not match exactly, and the reason is the noise floor: climbs under 3 m are discarded as sensor jitter, which removes a little real height along with a lot of imaginary height. A tool claiming these two numbers agree perfectly would be hiding that.

Ascent depends on method. Sample more finely and you measure noise as climbing; smooth harder and you flatten real hills. Anyone quoting a single authoritative number for a route this long is hiding that choice, so the settings used here are stated above and you can compare like with like.

Route facts, stages and the full description are on the Camino del Norte route page. Every route's profile is on the elevation profiles page, and how the ten routes compare puts the totals side by side.

Compare with another route

All measured the same way, so the numbers are comparable. Ordered by total ascent, hardest first.